America isn't in decline until Thomas Sowell says so...Gulp!

America, it seems, is always in decline.

Searching through Amazon.com reveals plenty of works arguing that America's best days are behind her. From the 1974 novel The Decline and Fall of America; to William Dietrich's 1991 book, In the Shadow of the Rising Sun: The Political Roots of American Economic Decline, about Japan's inevitable surpassing of America economically; to the more recent The Death of the West by the always upbeat Patrick Buchanan, most such works of gloom-and-doom have usually been followed by years of tremendous peace and prosperity. After a while it is hard to take any book about American decline seriously.

However, if there a reason to treat the idea of our society's fall with grave concern, it is that a book has now been written about it by Thomas Sowell.

Entitled Dismantling America, it is a collection of some of his more recent newspaper columns grouped into five sections -- government policies, political issues, economic issues, cultural issues, and legal issues -- with some added commentary beginning each section.

Sowell's thesis is encapsulated in the following passage:

The collapse of a civilization is not just the replacement of rulers or institutions with new rulers and new institutions. It is the destruction of a whole way of life and the painful, and sometimes pathetic, attempts to begin rebuilding amid the ruins.

Is that where American is headed? I believe it is. Our only saving grace is that we are not there yet.

Thomas Sowell asks, "Does any of this sound like America?" The answeer is, "no"

Just one year ago, would you have believed that an unelected government official, not even a Cabinet member confirmed by the Senate but simply one of the many "czars" appointed by the President, could arbitrarily cut the pay of executives in private businesses by 50 percent or 90 percent?

Did you think that another "czar" would be talking about restricting talk radio? That there would be plans afloat to subsidize newspapers-- that is, to create a situation where some newspapers' survival would depend on the government liking what they publish?

Did you imagine that anyone would even be talking about having a panel of so-called "experts" deciding who could and could not get life-saving medical treatments?

Scary as that is from a medical standpoint, it is also chilling from the standpoint of freedom. If you have a mother who needs a heart operation or a child with some dire medical condition, how free would you feel to speak out against an administration that has the power to make life and death decisions about your loved ones?

Does any of this sound like America?