Showing posts with label AP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AP. Show all posts

Sunday, November 1, 2009

An AP story that reveals why the AP fell from grace

Here, in four paragraphs, is a distilled sample of the explanation for the AP's fall from its lofty status as the world's preeminent news agency:

WASHINGTON (AP) - What's all the fuss about? After all the noise over Democrats' push for a government insurance plan to compete with private carriers, coverage numbers are finally in: Two percent.


That's the estimated share of Americans younger than 65 who'd sign up for the public option plan under the health care bill that Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is steering toward House approval.


The underwhelming statistic is raising questions about whether the government plan will be the iron-fisted competitor that private insurers warn will shut them down or a niche operator that becomes a haven for patients with health insurance horror stories.


Some experts are wondering if lawmakers have wasted too much time arguing about the public plan, giving short shrift to basics such as ensuring that new coverage will be affordable.

The number of people who would be covered initially by a puublic option has nothing to do with opposition to it.

Those who are opposed to a public option see it as a stalking horse for total government control of health care. A public option plan wold have no need to earn a profit. In fact, government could subsidize a public option, allowing it to undercut competitors and drive them out of business.

A public option that initially covers just 2 percent of Americans could eventually  cover 100 percen. At that point, total government control will have been effected.

Whether the AP would notice, or not, remains to be determined.





Saturday, August 8, 2009

Sarah Palin attacks Obama regime, AP defends

Sarah Palin, on her Facebook page, attacks the Obama regime's "death panel" as "downright evil." The AP, in what pretends to be a news account, counter-attacks, arguing that "millions of Americans already face rationing, as insurance companies rule on procedures they will cover. Denying coverage for certain procedures might increase under proposals to have a government-appointed agency identify medicines and procedures best suited for various conditions."

If a one-time news agency functions as a flack for the Democrat Party and its office holders, shouldn't it have to pay taxes?